Alternate facts or outrageous lies on crowd size

As soon as Trump become president comes a scary controversy: "alternate facts" on the crowd size. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/inauguration-crowd-size/514058/

Did the (bad?!) media photoshopped pictures to deliberately lie about crowd size? I don't think so. Now talking about "alternate facts" is just shameful. Look, facts are facts there are no alternate facts. This is just day 1 after the inauguration.

Wow, hundreds and thousands of women (and men) marched and protested on the same day: http://time.com/4642399/womens-march-united-states-cities/. Now that crowd size is definitely more than those who cheers for the new president. But waita minute... just what are they protesting about?

Other than frustrated at Trump... but I don't see specific demands like "resign now!" or "save obama care" and the march is yes very remarkable but achieving... nothing. Sorry.

How come this march does not take place EARLIER, like before December 19. When the outcome can ACTUALLY count... if enough electors will switch the vote to Clinton... then Trump will NOT be the president on January 20.

Now... ladies count at least close to half the population right? if enough ladies vote for Clinton (in those swing states), she would win... unfortunately there are really Trump women voters who don't mind at all voting him... Yes, a million of you came out, but still not enough.

Now, to ensure this won't happen again... perhaps a good first step is to throw away the electoral college system. (Anyone even saying that now?)

So you want to keep the electoral college system? Then we must respect the voting results. Sorry ladies, Trump is in. Too late. Should have acted earlier.

This administration is not looking good. Starting with outrageous lies.